<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sibelius or Finale?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charlesgriffin.net/archives/541/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charlesgriffin.net/archives/541</link>
	<description>blog, music, and information about the American composer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 18:49:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daina</title>
		<link>http://charlesgriffin.net/archives/541/comment-page-1#comment-15454</link>
		<dc:creator>Daina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charlesgriffin.net/?p=541#comment-15454</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a great decision - if not to switch to Sibelius completely, than at least to give it a try. I had been working with Finale (up to 2006 version) for many years, but after trying Sibelius I definitely don&#039;t want to go back to Finale. The difference is really significant. (I have been writing a lot of choir music and some symphonic scores.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a great decision &#8211; if not to switch to Sibelius completely, than at least to give it a try. I had been working with Finale (up to 2006 version) for many years, but after trying Sibelius I definitely don&#8217;t want to go back to Finale. The difference is really significant. (I have been writing a lot of choir music and some symphonic scores.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


